Wednesday, January 09, 2008
how to be gay
I was all set to write about my recent political ire (a post that's still brewing by the way), but I heard about this on the radio this morning and found it terribly amusing. It's the description of a very unique course offered (and strongly objected to) at the University of Michigan, and trust that if I could I would toootally sign up for it - if for no other reason than to listen in while people discuss topics like "muscle culture" in an academic forum:

How to be Gay: Male Homosexuality and Initiation.

Credits: (3; 2 in the half-term).

Instructor(s): David M Halperin (

Course Description:

Just because you happen to be a gay man doesn't mean that you don't have to learn how to become one. Gay men do some of that learning on their own, but often we learn how to be gay from others, either because we look to them for instruction or because they simply tell us what they think we need to know, whether we ask for their advice or not.

This course will examine the general topic of the role that initiation plays in the formation of gay male identity. We will approach it from three angles: (1) as a sub-cultural practice — subtle, complex, and difficult to theorize — which a small but significant body of work in queer studies has begun to explore; (2) as a theme in gay male writing; and (3) as a class project, since the course itself will constitute an experiment in the very process of initiation that it hopes to understand.

In particular, we will examine a number of cultural artifacts and activities that seem to play a prominent role in learning how to be gay: Hollywood movies, grand opera, Broadway musicals, and other works of classical and popular music, as well as camp, diva-worship, drag, muscle culture, taste, style, and political activism. Are there a number of classically 'gay' works such that, despite changing tastes and generations, all gay men, of whatever class, race, or ethnicity, need to know them, in order to be gay? What is there about gay identity that explains the gay appropriation of these works? What do we learn about gay male identity by asking not who gay men are but what it is that gay men do or like? One aim of exploring these questions is to approach gay identity from the perspective of social practices and cultural identifications rather than from the perspective of gay sexuality itself. What can such an approach tell us about the sentimental, affective, or subjective dimensions of gay identity, including gay sexuality, that an exclusive focus on gay sexuality cannot?

At the core of gay experience there is not only identification but disidentification. Almost as soon as I learn how to be gay, or perhaps even before, I also learn how not to be gay. I say to myself, 'Well, I may be gay, but at least I'm not like that!' Rather than attempting to promote one version of gay identity at the expense of others, this course will investigate the stakes in gay identifications and disidentifications, seeking ultimately to create the basis for a wider acceptance of the plurality of ways in which people determine how to be gay.

Additional note. This course is not a basic introduction to gay male culture, but an exploration of certain issues arising from it. It assumes some background knowledge. Students wishing to inform themselves about gay men and gay culture in a preliminary way should enroll in an introductory course in lesbian/gay studies.


Blogger Mary said...

So if they suggest you take a preliminary course in lesbian/gay studies, does this mean this is an advanced gay course? I bet the class would be very interesting.

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Actually, I know Halperin -- his office is right across the hall from Randy's -- and his work. The syllabus is really interesting in terms of the readings, and the class is really popular. You're probably thinking, Mrs. White, "Why am I not surprised..."

By the way, I read your other entry about Huck Finn and students who just don't want to think. It's really no surprise -- that's how Bush got elected ... twice.

Blogger Mrs. White said...

Brigitte, you're right - I'm absolutely unsurprised. :)

As to your second point...sigh and double sigh...

Post a Comment

<< Home